Growth in Brazil Presents a Double-edged Sword



As developed economies continue to muddle through an increasingly tenuous economic recovery, the need for multinationals to find new sources of growth in emerging markets is becoming ever more important. This is a trend that Frontier Strategy Group has been tracking for some time across our client base, and one that is particularly apparent in Latin America, where renewed focus on the region has led to average growth targets in excess of 20% for 2011. In order to meet these growth targets, executives are adopting a combination of strategies that includes expansion into new geographies and consumer segments as well as implementation of aggressive M&A plans.

One country where multinationals have seen a tremendous amount of growth over the past two years is Brazil. In the first half of 2011 Frontier Strategy Group member companies averaged 27% YoY growth in Brazil despite a cooling economic environment. These types of results are capturing the attention of corporate centers; however, the stellar performance of Brazilian business units presents a serious conundrum for many heads of region.

The conundrum stems from the fact that as regional heads are seeing more and more of their top-line growth in Latin America come from Brazil, they are experiencing a narrowing of bottom-line margins. The cost of doing business in Brazil, or Custo Brasil as it is known locally, is so high that business units there contribute significantly less to overall profitability than they do in other countries. For executives tasked with maintaining current levels of profitability while achieving unprecedented growth targets, the challenge posed by Custo Brasil is particularly daunting.

For this reason, Frontier Strategy Group is undertaking an effort to help multinationals diagnose and quantify Custo Brasil. The output from this effort will give executives the tools to identify and mitigate some of the more pernicious effects of Custo Brasil in their cost structures and determine which costs are due to local conditions as opposed to organizational structure and execution. By finding ways to narrow the gap in profitability between Brazilian business units and the rest of Latin America, Frontier Strategy Group is looking to ensure the continued success of multinationals in O País do Amanhã.

If you are interested in participating in this effort, please take a moment to fill out the following survey by clicking here (go to survey) or pasting the following link into your web browser: (http://vista-survey.com/survey/v2/survey2.dsb?ID=5131690207).

How MNCs are Managing Chinese Government Relations


The following is a cross post from the All Roads Lead to China blog. The blog is written by Frontier Strategy Group Shanghai-based expert adviser Richard Brubaker.

Meeting government officials, and getting a picture with them in China, is one thing. Working with them is a whole different animal, and over the course of my time in China I have had a number of experiences for both (although I am not one for pictures).

In many ways, the interactions that I have had with officials have been some of the most interesting in my time here, and with a number of my clients and my own projects involving government agencies on some level, I thought I would share a few things about what I feel makes for successful government relationships. Or at least provides for the best chances:

1) Having a clear value proposition (product, project, or partnership) that is aligned with the objectives of the organization you are in discussions with.

This is a lesson I learned most recently with one client as we discussed a nationwide program with two agencies. Agencies one was operationally the better partner, had more experience with the type of partnership we were discussing, but the alignment was not there as the goals of the organization (and the way they were measured by their superiors) were quite different. which for the managers we were speaking with there was nothing but risk. If the partnership succeeded, they would not be rewarded, but if there was a failure.. then they would be punished.

So, make sure there is alignment.

2) Understand the scope and scale of the potential partnership

Imagine being a cleantech firm with the most attractive technology, terms, or price.. but because your manufacturing is based in the EU.. and you can only supply a fraction of the need. Why would a government who is looking for scalable solutions buy your product? This is an issue many firms face, and really fail to realize that they face it.

The fact is that there are areas where foreign partnerships are needed, and needed in a big way, but if a firm cannot support the market for that need then it is not a solution that will rank as highly as a local firm who will risk it all to scale to the government need.

3) Have the necessary internal structures ready to manage the relationship.

Working with the government requires meetings. a LOT of meetings, and if there is anything that adds to those meetings is it when the organization that they are working with is lacking the size, structure, and coordination that they are looking for. If they are working with you, then there is likely a measure of risk that they are facing, and the best way to overcome their fears of instability (or failure) is to have a tight reporting structure who is geared up, anticipating the government needs, and is walking into the room with all the answers.

Walking into a meeting any other way will result in more meetings.. and more oversight… until the partner is comfortable again

4) Learn the difference between what official say, and what they (can) do

This is honestly one of the ones that I have the hardest time with. I am someone who (typically) acts first, and then speaks, but in a number of my interactions what I have found is that a lot of brainstorming occurs in meetings .. brainstorming that are in some ways used to place pressure on the counter party.. pressure that, if appropriately identified and deflected, can deflate through a range of responses

In the meeting, they are the master of their domain, but when it comes to actually executing, it will be their teams doing the work.. so, it is important to remember that there are things that are simply easier said than done… and things that are very difficult to speak about, but easily accomplished.

5) Be Prepared to Give

I was recently in the audience where James McGregor was speaking to a group of students and by far the best line of the speech was when he recounted the words of a leader he was speaking with…. that “If western firms want to be treated like Chinese firms, they should start acting like one”

I was once naive to think that I could ask for the moon and give nothing for it.. and many firms are no different. Being accepted is something that can be very rare, and the opportunities once accepted can be very interesting, lucrative, etc… but there is a cost. Perhaps it is giving up a bit of IP, or accepting the resumes of friends, or working with organizations that (while somehow aligned) you’d rather not… it is part of the game

Beyond these, and these are perhaps my top 5 for now, keeping an open mind when meeting with officials is really the only way to proceed forward. In one of my recent partnerships, what started off as a small and well defined project resulted in a partnership that is now growing in ways never imagined. It is one of those cases where the precedent was set, the partnership proved itself, and the curtain was lifted.

So, while there are certainly times where the partnerships can be tenuous and demanding, there are times where they can be rewarding.

The original post is titled Managing Government Relationships in China

 

« Previous Page